top of page
Home page_edited_edited_edited_edited.jpg

HOW I WORK

Much of my work takes place where objectives are clear, but paths forward are not due to regulatory uncertainty, institutional constraints, and competing expectations.

 

I draw on experience working closely with policy actors, firms, and institutions to support decision-making under these conditions. 

How working together typically looks like

Assignments are usually:

  • clearly scoped and time-bound

  • analytical or advisory in nature

  • focused on early-stage thinking, interpretation, and decision support

​

I am comfortable working independently or as part of a team, and often collaborate with economists, legal experts, technical specialists, and local partners.

Output examples

Depending on the assignment, work typically results in outputs such as: 

Analytical reports and research papers​

Providing structured analysis of sustainability regulation, policy instruments, green and just transition mechanisms, and their implications for firms and implementation.

Policy briefs, case studies and technical notes

Concise, decision-ready documents designed for senior policymakers, institutional leaders, and program managers.

​​

Scoping and diagnostic notes

Early-stage assessments used to clarify problem definitions, test assumptions, and inform the design of policy initiatives, programs, or next-phase work.

Presentations and briefing materials

Expert input into consultations and dialogues

Materials used in internal discussions, stakeholder meetings, and high-level exchanges, tailored to the audience and decision context.

Structured analytical input into stakeholder consultations, public-private dialogue processes, and multi-stakeholder discussions.

​

My working style

  • Evidence, with judgement: using evidence rigorously while being explicit about limits and assumptions, particularly in regulatory and SME contexts.

  • Clarity under complexity: focusing on structuring what matters for the decision at hand, especially where issues are complex or politically sensitive.

  • Translation into real conversations: shaping analysis for use in meetings, negotiations, and internal discussions, not just in reports.

  • Working with people (not abstractions): engaging with policymakers, firms, and partners in ways that reflect real incentives, pressures, and constraints.

​

->Examples of how this approach translates into practice are available under Work & Publications.

bottom of page